web statistics
IDADABASE: 10/01/2008 - 11/01/2008

Thursday, October 30, 2008

SOCIALISM, OR CAPITALISM WITH A HUMAN FACE?



Walking down SoHo one cannot ignore two things, the number of closed or closing stores and the number of empty stores with the shopkeepers in the front smoking or looking sad. We saw the manager of a large furniture store bending over behind a ledge and spying on another furniture store across the street because they seem to have a customer who was buying a few pieces.

Certain stores are still busy. Mac stores seem to not have been affected by the economic downturn. How long is it going to take for them to see a slowdown? Would they ever experience such a thing? We shall see.

Markets are up, well hovering around 9000, still 5000 points down from the peak of October 2007. the volitality of one day up and next day down, rather than showing a progress in the market, points to massive selling and the change of hands in the American capitalism. Banks have received bail out money, but they are unwilling to lend. Rather, they buy governmnent bonds and securities to flipm for short term profit. That was not the aim of the bail out. Watch out for a complete banking nationalization under Obama. he certainly can't talk about it right now, but every time he says that he is going to make sure that the middle and working class get something too I think of nationalization. Poor McCain and Plain are actually telling the truth about socialism.

The other day on the view the question of socialism came up and surptisingly, three out of four women agreed that America needs some kind of socilism. Woddy even said for Capilatism to work properly we need a level of socialistic programs. I could not believe what i was hearing. The following night in a bar, a group of healthcare workers cheered their jagger shots for communism. Is America really warming up to collectivism? Or they like to see capitalism with a human face? We shall see soon. Very soon. Tomorrow.

Labels:

TONIGHT (OCTOBER 30, 2008): STAN DOUGLAS AT DAVID ZWIRNER
525 West 19th Street (between 10th Ave. and West St.)
New York, NY 10011


Stan Douglas
Hastings Park, 16 July 1955, 2008
Digital C-print mounted to Dibond
60 x 89 1/4 inches

Labels:

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

BACK IN NYC... A BRIEF ENCOUNTER WITH A CITY IN CRISIS



Shops are empty, so as restaurants and the streets. Unlike every other year, tourists are missing from the streets. Shopkeepers are aggressive, but they can't magically put money in the pockets and enthusiasm in the hearts of the few who dare to go in. Obama's hope posters and change buttons are on the walls and on people's jackets, but nobody really talks about politics, instead, everyone keeps checking the stocks on their smart phones.

Last Friday, on the first day of our visit, We ran into a bunch of Vancouver art people in the Art Book Fair. The artist Noam Gonick took us to their booth and treated us with Canadian hospitality. Jeff Khonsari of Fillip mentioned my passionate performance at Jaque Rancier talk in UBC last winter. He had the courage to admit to me how pinpoint accurate I was to calling the French theorist on his bullshit about the impossibility of the end of Capitalism.

melanie O'brien at Artspeak table seemed worried about the state of the economy and the silence of the Canadian media regarding the state of our ever weakening dollar.

Thanks to Illingworth Kerr Gallery, I was able to score a copy of Tim Lee's new catalogue. I may hate the artist for his lack of social skills and his indiscreet display of self importance, but I have to admit, the more I read on his work, the more I like it. Can we like the art and dislike the artist? I think so. But we also can dislike the art and the artist, which is my case with the crap, oh sorry the craft of Brian Jungen. He had donated envelopes of 'art ideas' on sale at the Artspeak for 50 dollars. Excuse my bluntness, but do i need Brian to tell me how I can take some sport thing and remake it into an art object like his now very boring Nike Masks?

Here is a very good article on the state of contemporary art from New York Magazine. I quite enjoyed reading it and happen to agree with the writer.

To be continued...

Labels: , ,

Saturday, October 18, 2008

THE BURNING GORVE IN NABLUS


This is not a natural forest fire. The picture is from a burning 3000 olive grove near Nablus destroyed by Israeli settlers.

Labels:

Friday, October 17, 2008

MCCAIN'S RETURNING MELANOMA



by Lori Klaidman

I am a medical researcher and have a great deal of experience with melanoma having recently just lost a brother to it. What people don't seem to get about this cancer that at stage IIa, his chances of surviving to 10 years at stage IIa WERE 64 per cent. But nearly 10 years have past since the year 2000 since that diagnosis. It is MUCH lower now. Might it be more like 50 per cent survival to the end of his first potential term? This is an optimistic view, and a strong possibility because no one believes those cells have gone away or that he is in permanent remission. Further, the minute those melanoma cells migrate to a lymph node, his chances for survival are anywhere from 15-63 per cent. Note that his doctors were surprised that they had not already metastisized to the nearest lymph node in 2000, when it was investigated.

Despite the rosy picture that McCain's doctor's paint, they fully admit that melanoma cells are freely migrating throughout his blood stream and body. Because cancer cells lose their ability to slow down in a G1 phase during cell division, they are unable to rest and repair faithfully DNA strands during replication without error. Therefore it is only a matter of time before you get one cell that that has lost all control and becomes extremely aggressive with tumors doubling in size about every 45 days. In fact, the purpose of melanocytes, from which melanomas were derived from, means that they are already super hardy, whose main purpose is to protect oneself from the sun, and only a few minor mutations will create a deadly aggressive unstoppable cancer.

Furthermore, what little treatment there is for melanoma, such as interferon, relies on pumping up the immune system, which might give an extra 5 per cent to the statistics at best (melanoma is known for being chemo and radio insensitive). However, it is well known that anger and stress can dampen the immune system response. Can there be any doubt even among his supporters that McCain has a few "anger management" issues? Therefore what all of this could do is put his survival statistics at, perhaps 45 per cent to survive his first term as president? Fortunately, unlike most of us, he does have the best health care that money can buy. However, this time, even that is not likely to save him when it comes to melanoma, the deadliest, most untreatable cancer that exists.

Labels:

Thursday, October 16, 2008

A DIFFERENT KIND OF JEWISH POGROM


"Death to Arabs!" Young Jewish Mob attacks Palestinian homes and businesses.

By JONATHAN COOK FROM NAZARETH

Israel has been suffering its worst bout of inter-communal violence since the start of the second intifada, with a week of what has been widely presented as “rioting” by Jewish and Arab residents of the northern port city of Acre.

The trigger for the outbursts occurred on the night of Yom Kippur, or the Day of Atonement, the holiest day in the Jewish calendar. The country effectively shuts down for 24 hours as religious Jews fast and abstain from most activity, leaving secular Jews little choice but to do likewise.

According to reports, an Arab resident, Tawfik Jamal, outraged a group of Jews by disturbing the day’s sanctity and driving to relatives in a predominantly Jewish neighbourhood. He and his teenage son were pelted with stones.

The pair sought sanctuary in the relatives’ home as a mob gathered outside chanting “Death to the Arabs”. Israeli police who tried to rescue the family fled when they were attacked, too.

With news of Mr Jamal’s death mistakenly broadcast over mosque loudspeakers, Arab youths marched to the city centre and smashed shop windows in a display of anger.

In subsequent days, Jewish gangs have roamed Acre’s streets and torched several Arab homes, forcing dozens of Arab families living in Jewish-dominated areas to flee.

An Arab member of the Israeli parliament, Ahmed Tibi, observed that what is occurring in Acre is not a riot but a “pogrom”, conducted by Jewish residents against their Arab neighbours.

Communal tensions are always high in the half a dozen “mixed cities” like Acre, the only places in Israel where Jews and Arabs live in close proximity, even if in largely separate neighbourhoods.

But the situation has grown especially strained in Acre, where some Arab residents have escaped the deprivation and overcrowding of their main neighbourhood, the walled Old City, by moving to Jewish areas. Acre’s Arabs are also numerically strong, comprising a third of the local population.

Despite pronouncements from Israeli leaders that the violence is damaging Acre’s image as a model of coexistence, the reality is of a deeply divided city, where the wounds of the 1948 war have yet to heal.

During the war, most local Palestinians were either killed or forced to leave, with the remainder penned up in the old city. Jewish immigrants, brought to settle the empty houses, were encouraged to see themselves as reclaiming the city for Jews.

In recent years the movement of Arab families into these “Judaised” neighbourhoods has revived talk of the need for Acre to be cleansed again of its Arabs.

The problem has been exacerbated by the relocation to Acre of some of the fanatical settlers withdrawn from Gaza three years ago and by the founding in 2001 of a hesder yeshiva, a school for religious men that combines army service.

The police have stated that the violence in Acre caught them by surprise, but there was little justification for their complacency.

Abbas Zakour, an Arab member of parliament and an Acre resident, had written to the public security minister days before Yom Kippur warning that it would offer a pretext for Jewish extremists to attack Arab residents.

He was concerned that, as in previous years, Jews would throw stones at Arab cars breaking the unofficial 24-hour curfew in the Galilee region, where Arabs are a majority. The failure of the police to intervene, he added, “leads the Arab public to believe that police are deliberately allowing the young Jews to attack innocent Arab residents who drive by”.

In a society where the grip of Jewish religious fundamentalism is tightening – stoked by the high birth rate of ultra-Orthodox Jews and the state’s generous support of a separate religious education system – such incidents regularly occur on Yom Kippur and less frequently on Saturdays, the official day of rest.

The local media reported that over Yom Kippur ambulances and paramedics were stoned. At one point Acre’s ambulance station was surrounded by Jewish youths who smashed its windows. As a result, the service’s local director, Eli Been, ordered staff to wear helmets and bulletproof vests.

Given the failure to punish, or even rebuke, Jewish extremists for such acts of vandalism, it is hardly surprising that in places like Acre they are emboldened to vent their indignation at Arab neighbours.

What has particularly disturbed the Arab minority, however, has been the response from politicians and the police to events in Acre.

Israeli leaders have tried to calm tensions by paying lip service to the idea of coexistence. But at the same time, rather than denouncing the Jewish mob, they have intimated that Acre’s Arab residents provoked the attacks.

During Sunday’s cabinet meeting, Ehud Olmert, the outgoing prime minister, stressed, in reference to the Yom Kippur violence, that the wider Arab population must act “according to the norms of a democratic state”.

His probable successor, Tzipi Livni, added of Yom Kippur that “every citizen has to respect this day” – a reprimand to Arab citizens for driving rather than to extremist Jews for turning into a lynch mob.

Such indirect condemnations roused others to greater provocation. Yuval Steinitz of the Likud Party called the violence a “pogrom” against, rather than by, Acre’s Jews. The local chief rabbi, Yosef Yashar, compared the city’s Arabs to Nazis. And on Monday Jewish far-right activists arrived in Acre from Hebron to stir things further.

Mr Jamal, the hapless driver who provoked the violence, has been widely blamed – apparently without evidence – for playing his music loudly and smoking while driving, as though this justified the attack.

He was finally brought before the parliament on Sunday to demonstrate his contrition. To much abuse from right-wing legislators, he asked for forgiveness and told the parliament he was ready to “sacrifice his neck” to restore good relations between the two communities.

The next day the country’s president, Shimon Peres, reminded community leaders: “There is one law and one police.”

As if to disprove him, the police arrested Mr Jamal the same day, accusing him of offending religious sensitivities, speeding and reckless endangerment – though it was unclear whom he had endangered apart from himself. He was released to house arrest two days later.

Mr Tibi, the parliamentarian, sounded a rare note of sanity when he observed: “I wonder if they will start to arrest Jews who eat and drink during the month of Ramadan.”

Meanwhile, Acre’s Jewish residents are organising a boycott of Arab businesses. They have apparently been joined by the mayor, Shimon Lankri, who cancelled the annual drama festival due to be held in the Old City in a few days. His move was widely interpreted as a way to “punish” Arab residents, who are major beneficiaries of the event.

Articulating popular sentiments, a senior police official told a local website: “The Arab public will pay dearly for the events of Yom Kippur eve. They have succeeded in greatly antagonising the Jewish population and I don’t see them being forgiven for the next few years.”

In what looked like a desperate move to avert further damage to the Old City’s already weak economy, Arab community leaders issued a condemnation of Mr Jamal and a plea for tolerance – though the gesture was not reciprocated by their Jewish counterparts.

Few in the Arab minority share their president’s confidence about the legal system. They see that there are two sets of laws, one for Jews and another Arabs, and that the police have two faces, depending on who is doing the stone-throwing.

They know that when Jewish settlers attack Palestinians in the West Bank, or even Israeli soldiers, they do so with impunity. Equally, they remember that in 2005 when a settler opened fire on a bus with his army-issue gun in the Galilean town of Shefa’amr, killing four Arab citizens, the police’s priority was chasing the Arab men they suspected had overpowered and killed him.

Even more painful are memories of the events at the beginning of the intifada, in October 2000, when Arab citizens protested against the military whirlwind unleashed against their Palestinian kin in the occupied territories. The worst violence inside Israel occurred at the town of Umm al-Fahm, where Arab demonstrators threw stones at cars driving along the nearby highway.

Politicians did not talk about Arab sensitivities, or the need for calm, at that time. Instead they sent in a sniper unit. In the ensuing crackdown 13 Arab demonstrators were shot dead, and hundreds injured with live ammunition and rubber bullets.

Jonathan Cook is a writer and journalist based in Nazareth, Israel. His latest books are “Israel and the Clash of Civilisations: Iraq, Iran and the Plan to Remake the Middle East” (Pluto Press) and “Disappearing Palestine: Israel's Experiments in Human Despair” (Zed Books). His website is www.jkcook.net.

Labels:

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

ANGLO CANADIANS AND ARTS



We all know what Harper said: "when ordinary Canadians come home after work and turn the TV on and see an art gala with rich people" His bottom line was that ordinary Canadians don't care so much for arts.

Harper was right and wrong about culture.
The election results show us that he was right about the english Canada and wrong about the French Canadians. This means, if it wasn't for quebec, we could have had a majority Conservative government. The percentage drop in the Conservative support correlates exactly to the way Quebec people revolted against harper after the art comment. English Canada, however, came out and supported harper even more so. Maybe English Canada doesn't really care about arts?

Thank you Quebec for caring for art and culture.

Labels: ,

THESE ARE THE GREENS WE KNOW




in Vancouver's last mayoral race, an unknown James Green stole the election for Sam Sullivan by confusing voters about the name of the left wing candidate Jim Green on the ballot. Even I almost voted for James Green in that election, thinking that this could be Jim's complete first name, before I found the real Jim Green somewhere down on the ballot.

There were a few stories in the media discussing the possibility of NPA/Sam Sullivan campaign helping James Green in stealing more than 6000 votes. Here and here.

But today, I'd like to begin talking about another fraudulent Green: the Green Party of Canada. For now, I would like to show you the name of the ridings in which NDP and Liberals would have easily won the contest had it not been for Green's sudden rise in public profile. Let's not forget the pro Harper media outlets (David Asper's CanWest and Ivan Fecan's CTV Globe Media that also owns the Globe & Mail) who provided the Green party with the space, also CBC for including the Green leader in the debate.

We really need to look into Green's fundraising and go over the media coverage to see how green managed to spoil the election for the Liberals and NDP.

For now, here are the 16 ridings that the Green party delivered to the Conservatives:

Nunavut -Northwest Territories
North Vancouver -British Columbia
vancouver Island North -British Columbia
Surrey North -British Columbia
Ottawa Orleans -Ontario
Mississauga Erindale -Ontario
Kitchener Centre -Ontario
Kitchener Waterloo -Ontario
London West _Ontario
Oakridges Markham -Ontario
Thornhill -Ontario
West Nova -Nova Scotia
South Shore St. Margarets -Nova Scotia
Central Nova -Nova Scotia
Egmont -Prince Edward Island
St. john -Newfoundland

Labels:

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

TEN DAYS THAT SHOOK HENREY PAULSON



Henry Paulson concerning taxpayers money - flashback: Sept 23 , Senate Banking Committee:

“Some said we should just stick capital in the banks, take preferred stock in the banks. That’s what you do when you have failure.”

Henry Oct 10, Henrey Paulson's Press Conference:

"We can use the taxpayer’s money more effectively and efficiently, get more for the taxpayer’s dollar, if we develop a standardized program to buy equity in financial institutions,”

Labels:

Saturday, October 11, 2008

IS THIS CESSPOOL REAL?



Labels:

Wednesday, October 08, 2008

IS USA AT THE BRINK OF A MILITARY COUP?



NAOMI WOLF'S INTERVIEW WITH A RETIRED AIR FORCE COLONEL

U.S. Rep. Brad Sherman of California said to Congress, captured on C-Span and viewable on YouTube, that individual members of the House were threatened with martial law within a week if they did not pass the bailout bill: "The only way they can pass this bill is by creating and sustaining a panic atmosphere. … Many of us were told in private conversations that if we voted against this bill on Monday that the sky would fall, the market would drop two or three thousand points the first day and a couple of thousand on the second day, and a few members were even told that there would be martial law in America if we voted no."

To verify this information Naomi wolf, an American writer and activist contacted and interviewed Vietnam veteran, retired U.S. Air Force Colonel and patriot David Antoon for clarification.

If the President directed the First Brigade to arrest Congress, what could stop him?
"Nothing. Their only recourse is to cut off funding. The Congress would be at the mercy of military leaders to go to them and ask them not to obey illegal orders."

But these orders are now legal?
"Correct."

If the President directs the First Brigade to arrest a bunch of voters, what would stop him?
"Nothing. It would end up in courts but the action would have been taken."

If the President directs the First Brigade to kill civilians, what would stop him?
"Nothing.

What would prevent him from sending the First Brigade to arrest the editor of the Washington Post?
"Nothing. He could do what he did in Iraq -- send a tank down a street in Washington and fire a shell into the Washington Post as they did into Al Jazeera, and claim they were firing at something else."

What happens to members of the First Brigade who refuse to take up arms against U.S. citizens?
"They'd probably be treated as deserters as in Iraq: arrested, detained and facing five years in prison. In Iraq a study by Ann Wright shows that deserters -- reservists who refused to go back to Iraq -- got longer sentences than war criminals."

Does Congress have any military of their own?
"No. Congress has no direct control of any military units. The Governors have the National Guard but they report to the President in an emergency that he declares."

Who can arrest the President?
"The Attorney General can arrest the President after he leaves or after impeachment." [Note: Prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi has asserted it is possible for District Attorneys around the country to charge President Bush with murder if they represent districts where one or more military members who have been killed in Iraq formerly resided.]

Given the danger do you advocate impeachment?
"Yes. President Bush struck down Posse Comitatus -- which has prevented, with a penalty of two years in prison, U.S. leaders since after the Civil War from sending military forces into our streets -- with a 'signing statement.' He should be impeached immediately in a bipartisan process to prevent the use of military forces and mercenary forces against U.S. citizens"

Should Americans call on senior leaders in the Military to break publicly with this action and call on their own men and women to disobey these orders?
"Every senior military officer's loyalty should ultimately be to the Constitution. Every officer should publicly break with any illegal order, even from the President."

But if these are now legal. If they say, 'Don't obey the Commander in Chief,' what happens to the military?
"Perhaps they would be arrested and prosecuted as those who refuse to participate in the current illegal war. That's what would be considered a coup."

But it's a coup already.
"Yes."

Labels:

MCCAIN CALLING OBAMA "THAT ONE"

Labels: ,

Tuesday, October 07, 2008

Monday, October 06, 2008

KEITH OLBERMANN COMMENT ON PALIN

Sunday, October 05, 2008

ZIZEK'S INTERVIEW ON THE CURRENT SITUATION

Labels: ,

Saturday, October 04, 2008

Friday, October 03, 2008

DEAD CAN DANCE, EVEN HARPER

Labels: ,

SARAH SILVERMAN VOTES FOR OBAMA

Labels: ,

WE BOTH LOVE ISRAEL

Labels: ,

Thursday, October 02, 2008

Wednesday, October 01, 2008

GREENSPAN'S ROLE IN THE CURRENT MELTDOWN